Unity apologizes and updates their infamous Runtime Fee

Comments

• Hazzard@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Seems like a sensible overhaul, hitting the major issues with the fee, but still going ahead with a version of it. Big points for me:

  • Not retroactive. Only affecting the next version of Unity, and you can even opt out of updating to skip the fee.
  • Data is now reported by the customers. Still not sure how that plan to enforce this, but it’s a hell of a lot better than some arbitrary data collection scheme being baked into the game.
  • Free version is excluded. No charging tiny side projects, or students or something, it only affects already paying customers.

  Still not sure I love charging per install as a concept, and they’ve already overplayed their hand and burnt many bridges, but at least this implementation isn’t insanely hostile. Guess we’ll see how this plays out from here.

  source

  • Uranium3006@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    The trust is already gone. I would never use unity after all this

    source
  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That’s great but they didn’t say a single word about:

    • the silent license update they made to enable this whole shitshow, which people discovered after they changed the license and had to find archived copies of the previous license to compare against
    • the scummy and anticompetitive (and, in some jurisdictions, possibly illegal) fee vouchers they were handing out to try to nuke AppLovin’s customer base

    The retroactive fee stuff was pure idiocy, but the above points are also deeply concerning and problematic, and indicate a leadership culture that appears entirely unconcerned with business ethics. And the exec team is not changing. They will try something similar in the future.

    source
  • Ferk@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Free version is excluded. No charging tiny side projects, or students or something, it only affects already paying customers.

    This was not a change though, it as already the case before in the previous announcement.

    source
  • BolexForSoup@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    And you can even opt out of updating to skip the fee.

    Yeah but how long is this solution really viable?

    source

    • nous@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Long enough to learn and switch to a new engine, possibly on your next game.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Sigmatics@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    No game with less than $1 million in trailing 12-month revenue will be subject to the fee.

    source
• RealFknNito@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  As someone wise and balding said “The trust is gone and there’s no getting that back. Even if they retract everything and apologize it’s gone.”

  source
• Bruisedback@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Even after this walk back, the whole situation still sucks for everybody but Unity. Even the part about removing the "requirement to use the Made with Unity splash screen" bit seems like blatant self-preservation more than capitulation. They've got to be aware that there are probably consumers out there willing to boycott any game with that splash screen, leading to lower install numbers. I'm not in game dev, so I'm just talking out of my ass, but it doesn't seem like studios are really bothered by including those pre-roll splash screens all that much.

  source
• Swarfega@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Fuck Unity. Yet another 2023 company shitting on its users.

  source

  • peter@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Public companies will always screw you over

    source
• Hexagons@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I’m not surprised they walked it back. They’ve pulled the classic “new coke” trick here: put out something deeply terrible no one will ever agree to, then walk it back pretty significantly to something still shitty and exploitative, but not as bad as what you had threatened. Your customers feel like this is a win, but they’re still stuck with a worse deal than before the beginning of the debacle.

  source