Stable Audio: Fast Timing-Conditioned Latent Audio Diffusion — Stability AI

Comments

• TimeSquirrel@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  This is going to kickstart the "electronic music isn't music" debate all over again.

  source

  • 9point6@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I think the difference with this before was that people thought electronic musicians weren’t really doing anything and the computer just spat out music, when there was actually a load of work going into it.

    This is pretty much literally what people were saying was happening before, so the argument would probably be a bit more valid this time around.

    source
  • MossBear@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Its music, but the level of skill to make it is low, and therefore of little credit to the one who makes it.

    source
• LanternEverywhere@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Previous AI audio generators were quite bad, but damn the snippets they present on this one sound really, really good.

  source

  • ubermeisters@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I’m going to disagree with you extremely hard there. I follow several AI music artists that make absolutely phenomenal music.

    source

    • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Can you drop some links? I’m interested.

      source
• BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Can this kind of stuff be used for music restoration? I have a song that sounds kind of garbled and poorly balanced (it came from RealAudio over dialup) and to my knowledge it’s never been released.

  source

  • bioemerl@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Contrary to what the other guy is talking about, you can totally use AI for restoration. At least sometimes. It depends on how this thing is programmed and if it supports something like stable diffusions control net

    source

    • LanternEverywhere@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Totally. AI does serious improvement to visual resolution upscaling, so it should be capable of sound serious audio resolution upscaling. Upscaled media never is exactly like the original, but its quality is massively improved to the way humans perceive things.

      source
  • echo64@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    you can’t really use AI for restoration at all, modern AI systems are based around generating just, whatever. and the hope is that with enough training the whatever will bias towards what you want.

    this means that it can’t restore, it can’t reason about what was originally there, it can only make it’s own thing and we hope that with enough training it’ll fool humans enough not to matter.

    if all you want is something to sound “better” and don’t care about the restoration aspect then sure. if you want what was originally there, no

    source

    • admiralteal@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      You're making a conservation vs restoration argument here.

      Restoration is what the guy is asking about, I suspect, not conservation.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• peopleproblems@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Ok, this is the shit I have wanted.

  I love music, I just don’t have the patience to learn modern technology. This could at least help me get ideas out of my head.

  source