Archived version: archive.ph/73oYB
Archived version: web.archive.org/…/judge-in-us-v-google-trial-didn…
So long as they know the difference come the end of it, it's fine. Judges are only experts on the law. Everything else is research and what's presented as evidence, testimony, and argument in court.
It's going to be someone's responsibility to teach the judge, and if the state attourney doesn't do it, that's really on them.
Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I’m not asking the people in the courtroom to be subject matter experts.
But I would like it if the judge, the one person who has the most power in that courtroom, to be able understand a wee bit more about technology than a 5th grader.
johnyrocket@feddit.ch 1 week ago
I am not disagreeing with you, but I would argue not knowing exactly what firefox is is a trait of the average gen Z. They are surprisingly tech illiterate. If it isn’t pre installed on their iPhone or a feature of short form content, they won’t know what it is.
x4740N@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Tue least they could to is bring in an advisor to explain things
Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
Finally, an actual use for consultants.
highfiveconnoisseur@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Arguably less than a 5th grader. I’d argue that the average 5th grader knows that Firefox is not a search engine.