[deleted]

Comments

• WtfEvenIsExistence@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  “Can I use the bathroom?”

  “I don’t know? Can you?”

  “Yes” urinates on teacher’s desk

  source

  • Steve@communick.news ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    “Appears, you couldn’t use the bathroom.”

    source

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      They are still able to use the bathroom, they just didnt.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• aksdb@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Oh god, it’s a paradox! She implicitly makes an example, which makes it not being an example, which makes it an example again! Whaaaaaaaaa

  source
• CaptObvious@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  A joke that only a linguist could love. :D

  source

  • Daft_ish@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Connie. Connie linguist.

    source

    • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      One who speaks in tunnels is a tunnel linguist.

      source
• LoamImprovement@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Ironically, this is an excellent demonstration of the significance of ignoring pragmatics.

  source

  • Kerrigor@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    thatsthejoke.jpeg

    source
  • lugal@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Ironically, not getting the joke is an excellent demonstration of the significance of ignoring pragmatics.

    source
• lolcatnip@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  This is my favorite example: youtu.be/yUl4Fw1jsXY?si=heWRF6tb8Mz1IdtS

  source

  • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    What is this called? Not the show but the type of answering questions in their literal and basic sense.

    source

    • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I think real lawyers would call it “Objection, nonresponsive.”

      source
  • joshballz@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Such a great show. It deserved better.

    source