Bruh it’s replacing nuclear. Why is it replacing the WRONG THING?? 🤬😩😭
Share of global electricity generation by source (2000-2025)
Submitted 3 weeks ago by Innerworld@lemmy.world to energy@slrpnk.net
https://cdn.statcdn.com/Infographic/images/normal/36122.jpeg
Comments
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 weeks ago Because nuclear makes no economic sense 🤷
SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Much of that has to do with the age of the nuclear fleet.
China is building reactors with significantly lower costs than the ones built in the west 40-60 years ago.
Nuclear is excellent for base loan and high power density requirements, like industrial electrification, where the cost of transmission and storage would quickly become too expensive.
cristian64@reddthat.com 3 weeks ago
According to the graph, it’s rather replacing all of them.
ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’m really looking forward what 2026 will look like in such a statistic.
pulsewidth@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Me too! Nice to feel the joy of optimism occasionally.
crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Of all the fucking awful news, this trend has been a consistent bright spot for me for years.