Well, there’s shirts that don’t have a logo on them both expensive and inexpensive for varying levels of quality. The bigger brands just used them as a branding for a specific level of quality and marketing.
Truth
Submitted 2 weeks ago by Beep@lemmus.org to [deleted]
https://i.redd.it/27br0a4tw2lg1.jpeg
Comments
Tortellinius@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
sightsteer for that which you support.
20cello@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
They should pay customers imo but we’re too stupid
pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Because brands create division and that’s what the govt wants
kboos1@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I think you’re giving them too much credit.
jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
And do they really create division? Are people with adidas shirts fighting people with Nike shirts?
thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Governments?
bearboiblake@pawb.social 2 weeks ago
I understand what you’re saying OP, you keep fighting the good fight <3
nil@piefed.ca 2 weeks ago
I got 5 wilkinson t-shirts for free so can’t complain
Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I always thought this about cars. You should get a discount by letting them stick their name and symbols all over it for their free advertising.
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
First thing I did when I got my truck was take the dealer stickers off.