AI doomerism is pure fiction and a marketing ploy.
AI social platforms like Moltbook are potential accelerators of existential risk that should be regulated as critical infrastructure
Submitted 1 day ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
Deestan@lemmy.world 1 day ago
jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
No moltbook until you are at least 16 seconds old, young bot.
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 23 hours ago
For a while I thought maybe the best protest against AI would be to try and get it to escape containment.
Only in the existential risk scenario would our society bother to lift a finger.
But I no longer believe we would do anything, as long as the AI contributed to capital markets we’d let it destroy us.
I feel very depressed and empty today.
HailSeitan@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Criti-hype
vane@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Isn’t Moltbook acquired by Meta ?
aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Look, I hate AI as much as the next guy, but this article is pointless fear mongering and is based on a flawed understanding of current AI architecture.
brsrklf@jlai.lu 1 day ago
Sounds a bit like those Anthropic researchers who keep finding new ways Claude did something unexpected and scary every other week.
We don’t care whether you’re scared or amazed : TALK ABOUT IT.
XLE@piefed.social 1 day ago
As soon as I saw the word “existential”, red flags went up for me, too. I looked, and of course, this is a piece of propaganda molded by a think tank.
I’m kind of impressed how paranoid this piece is. I saw some MSM articles about “AIs making a religion” when these “religion"s were described and then discarded, but apparently whoever wrote this just assumed you’d been fed your media slop already, and he could focus on the doomsday scenario.