Maybe the maintainer of LemmyNSFW actually meant a different NSFW acronym like “No Shoes For Whales” and was confused about the content they were hosting
LemmyNSFW and Saidit are dead. Which Platform is next?
Submitted 1 day ago by Beep@lemmus.org to [deleted]
https://lemmus.org/pictrs/image/ea78cb94-13ae-4e11-ba94-049552900961.webp
Comments
Greg@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Angryhumanoid@fedinsfw.app 1 day ago
Well I for one spent a lot of time on LemmyNSFW and can confidently state that I never once saw a whale wearing shoes on it, so they must have been doing something right.
thermal_shock@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Nsfwbrowser.com
m0n4p@fedinsfw.app 1 day ago
https://fedinsfw.app/c/fedinsfw/p/1/rip-lemmynsfw-fedinsfw-is-live-and-donations
LemmyNSFW explainer here. Also new instance to replace it. Not dead.
gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Lemmy has been dropping users for a while, now. The Fediverse in general, really…
I don’t think that’s bad, per se, but it makes sense that a few servers end up dropping out. Few people use them.
spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 1 day ago
I think lemmynsfw is one of tge largest lemmy instance.
gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Ah well, I suppose that’s a different issue then!
AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Do we know why? And is it a represented trend in the fediverse or are we overall maintaining health?
Rothe@piefed.social 1 day ago
It does highlight a potential problem with the way the fediverse functions, if too many communities are controlled by a single instance. The fediverse was meant to allievate centralisation, but in reality it has only slightly alleviated it (at least for some instances).
How big a percentage of lemmy would be lost if the lemmy.world servers was disconnected in the same way for example?
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 21 hours ago
End of the day, shit cost money. As much as people love to live in bullshit denial about that fact.
Unless people are willing to pony up said money for free out of their own goodness with no strings attached AND you find people that are entirely trust worthy to manage those funds and put them entirely and only towards the intent they were given.
You will always find the same problem. Shit HAS to be centralized. You can have more then one central pillar that stand together but at the end of the day all your doing is spreading the load.
You can’t have an infinite number of pillars either it’s just not possible. And that’s the “idea” behind shit like federation. That some magic bullshit will happen and we will totally spread the load, costs and burder so perfectly that it can’t be knocked down.
When in reality it’s even more fragile than a single pillar supporting everything.
You have to find a middle ground, a number of central pillars that support each other. But you have to accept your just creating a more unstable house of cards.
Where a single sole pillar is easily corrupted, a group is easily toppled.
The frediverse is slowly learning that the idea behind it is a lot more iffy in reality then on paper. Hopefully it will adapt and not just stubbornly ignore the problem because of stupid shit. Because I fully believe that given enough effort the “decentralized” path as laughable as that term is. Is the right one forward.
I have very little faith in people to not be stupid tho.
kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Agreed. To maintain health there needs to be a easy way to backup and migrate communities and user profiles between instances.
Without this theres just 1000 single points of failure rather than one.
FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 1 day ago
There’s a new nsfw place now
I do wonder what happened though to the old one
The internet is for porn before all else
Rothe@piefed.social 1 day ago
lemmynsfw apparently adminned by a single person, who went awol some time ago, and then stopped paying for the servers recently. An example of why instances should not be controlled by one person, but instead some sort of community.
myrmidex@belgae.social 1 day ago
Then it gets ideological rapidly. How to come to an agreement: majority vs consensus? Once a conclusion is reached, can all press the button or just one delegate? It brings so many questions.
I think it’s much more elegant to just abandon one server in favor of the other.