Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Scientists have confirmed that a 26ft tall, tree-trunk-shaped organism, first discovered in Scotland in 1843, isn't a fungus or plant, but an entirely distinct evolutionary branch of life

⁨187⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Innerworld@lemmy.world⁩ to ⁨archaeology@mander.xyz⁩

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/01/21/new-form-of-life-discovered-and-its-26ft-tall/

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • someguy3@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    But new research from the University of Edinburgh and National Museums Scotland has shown the fossil is neither fungus nor plant, but a new lifeform that became extinct around 370 million years ago.

    Sandy Hetherington, the lead co-author and research associate at National Museums Scotland, said: “They are life, but not as we now know it, displaying anatomical and chemical characteristics distinct from fungal or plant life, and therefore belonging to an entirely extinct evolutionary branch of life.”

    source
    • victorz@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      an entirely extinct evolutionary branch of life

      Pardon my ignorance, I seem to have misunderstood the meaning of “extinct” (?).

      source
      • someguy3@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        It’s a fossil.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • molestme247@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      ‘They are life’ wtf? LoL

      source
      • wewbull@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        …because it’s multiple lifeforms making a single structure. The plural is correct.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • cryptTurtle@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Wiki has a breakdown of the debate and how it’s evolved: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototaxites

    Neat stuff

    source
    • calliope@retrolemmy.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      This has absolutely blown my mind!

      This looks exactly like the kind of whose ancestors would, over millions of years, eventually mutate to become a tree.

      The polished fossil in the Wikipedia article looks a shocking amount like wood!

      source
      • Naz@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Dude; I think you’re absolutely correct.

        It looks like a proto-tree

        Also: Trees aren’t a uniform genus, but this goes to show, on any planet that has photosynthesis, trees will eventually evolve spontaneously

        source
      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        there were “trees” before actual trees evolved. in the carbiniferous, mostly from lycophytes,

        source
    • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      One of the linked papers thinks it’s actually horizontal rather vertical, as people have guessed originally.

      source
  • ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Spooky phallus.

    source
    • Triumph@fedia.io ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      That doesn't narrow it down.

      source
  • lvxferre@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    My guess is that it’s a relative of red algae and plants/Viridiplantae, but not quite either.

    At least one source mentions it produces lignin or something similar; lignin is present in both clades I mentioned. However since it doesn’t do photosynthesis we can rule out belonging to those clades, I genuinely don’t think evolution would favour ditching phycoerythrin or chlorophyll, so odds are it never developed either.

    source
    • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      However since it doesn’t do photosynthesis we can rule out belonging to those clades,

      There are plants and algae that don’t do photosynthesis (although I think they still have vestigial chloroplast?)

      source
      • lvxferre@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Non-photosynthetic plants (like ghost pipes) are typically rather small parasites of other plants, that for some reason lost access to good sunlight (such as being so deep in a forest that other plants call dibs on those yummy photons). I don’t see how it would be the case here, given the fossil in question is 8m tall, and apparently it predates actual (Viridiplantae) trees. And I think the same reasoning applies to a potential Rhodophyta = red alga.

        In fact the size is bugging me. Why did it grow so big? Plants usually do this because they’re trying to outcompete other plants, but the Wikipedia article about the taxon suggests it was heterotrophic.

        source
  • Zacryon@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    About 7,9248 m

    source
    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Decimal commas are a lie to cover up that they found Yggdrasil

      source
  • Maeve@kbin.earth ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    https://archive.ph/LEcGT

    source