Wiki has a breakdown of the debate and how it’s evolved: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototaxites
Neat stuff
Submitted 2 weeks ago by Innerworld@lemmy.world to archaeology@mander.xyz
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/01/21/new-form-of-life-discovered-and-its-26ft-tall/
Wiki has a breakdown of the debate and how it’s evolved: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototaxites
Neat stuff
This has absolutely blown my mind!
This looks exactly like the kind of whose ancestors would, over millions of years, eventually mutate to become a tree.
The polished fossil in the Wikipedia article looks a shocking amount like wood!
Dude; I think you’re absolutely correct.
It looks like a proto-tree
Also: Trees aren’t a uniform genus, but this goes to show, on any planet that has photosynthesis, trees will eventually evolve spontaneously
there were “trees” before actual trees evolved. in the carbiniferous, mostly from lycophytes,
One of the linked papers thinks it’s actually horizontal rather vertical, as people have guessed originally.
Spooky phallus.
That doesn't narrow it down.
My guess is that it’s a relative of red algae and plants/Viridiplantae, but not quite either.
At least one source mentions it produces lignin or something similar; lignin is present in both clades I mentioned. However since it doesn’t do photosynthesis we can rule out belonging to those clades, I genuinely don’t think evolution would favour ditching phycoerythrin or chlorophyll, so odds are it never developed either.
However since it doesn’t do photosynthesis we can rule out belonging to those clades,
There are plants and algae that don’t do photosynthesis (although I think they still have vestigial chloroplast?)
Non-photosynthetic plants (like ghost pipes) are typically rather small parasites of other plants, that for some reason lost access to good sunlight (such as being so deep in a forest that other plants call dibs on those yummy photons). I don’t see how it would be the case here, given the fossil in question is 8m tall, and apparently it predates actual (Viridiplantae) trees. And I think the same reasoning applies to a potential Rhodophyta = red alga.
In fact the size is bugging me. Why did it grow so big? Plants usually do this because they’re trying to outcompete other plants, but the Wikipedia article about the taxon suggests it was heterotrophic.
About 7,9248 m
Decimal commas are a lie to cover up that they found Yggdrasil
someguy3@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
victorz@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Pardon my ignorance, I seem to have misunderstood the meaning of “extinct” (?).
someguy3@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s a fossil.
molestme247@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
‘They are life’ wtf? LoL
wewbull@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
…because it’s multiple lifeforms making a single structure. The plural is correct.