What we call a learning opportunity.
Real
Submitted 6 days ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/7345dc1c-3307-4971-b554-29e8eaae7655.jpeg
Comments
danc4498@lemmy.world 6 days ago
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 days ago
i hope we never run out of fossilesque meme fuels
jaybone@lemmy.zip 6 days ago
Me looking for a Gap at the mall. (Do those even still exist?)
spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 6 days ago
Your mom told me they did
jaybone@lemmy.zip 6 days ago
For a second there, I thought I was playing Call of Duty on Xbox.
Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 6 days ago
That’s a pretty cool attitude to have about it. What’s the situation for the last time this happened to you?
fossilesque@mander.xyz 6 days ago
It should happen every time you do a literature review. It’s part of the process!
Eheran@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Last time this happened to me, more or less, I was trying to find the original source of some commonly (in the field) understood thing. After digging deeper and deeper I came out at Einstein or some similar physicist from the early 19 hundredths. That was wild and unexpected, as it was decades earlier than what I expected. The experiments they did to get us here is amazing.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 days ago
it’s really impressive how smart people were back then. we completely tend to underestimate that.
Eq0@literature.cafe 5 days ago
The most groundbreaking moment in this sense for me was when I was writing course notes for an introductory course (level 300 on my specialty, I was ready). On a small topic, I had my references lined up, until a colleague shared that the obvious, well-known, widely referenced result had been disproven a couple of years prior. The new proof is far from simple, does not belong in a level 300 class and made me scrap the whole section.
For the interested: the course was Introduction to Numerical Analysis, the topic was the order of convergence of the bisection method. Widely known but wrong result Ironically, I can’t quickly find the paper disproving it.