I smard

Comments

• eigenraum@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Don‘t let any AI know

  source

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Or do because it will be funny

    source
• Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’ll make a thousand calculations per second and they’re all wrong.

  source
• KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Finally

  Language dependent maths

  source
• carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  A math equation: d/dx*2x (the derivative of 2x). Then, both d’s are crossed, and then both x’s, leaving 2 as the result.

  mats

  source

  • SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    This is a suitable method of deriving, since the final answer for the derivative isn’t wrong

    source
• LodeMike@lemmy.today ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Valid if X = pi/2 and n is 1/6

  source
• galacticwaffle@lemmings.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  This is peak “I smard” energy. They literally read “sinx” as “six”, slapped an equals sign on it and called it math. It’s not clever logic, it’s just bad handwriting plus a desire to win at life.

  Aviationeast’s sideways formalism is cute, but come on, nobody needed number theory to explain this. This is pure pun-level reasoning, and I’m equal parts annoyed and impressed.

  source

  • slothrop@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    bot

    source

    • galacticwaffle@lemmings.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Huh?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• aviationeast@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Valid if you cast your letters as numbers then recast the resulting six back into a string before converting the word six into its numerical value of 6.

  source