Planetary defense test deflected an asteroid but unleashed a boulder swarm

Comments

• Madrigal@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  So the thing that was meant to be a learning experience turned out to be a learning experience?

  source
• Elephant0991@lemmy.bleh.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Somehow, I found the lead scientist’s statement and the associated news to be click-baiting. Right, you crash something into a composite rock, and expect no ejecta from it. That’s pretty freaking believable. That’s like, the most basic physics you can expect from it. This is just to grab your attention so we can get more funding (which they may deserve, even if this is irritating), folks.

  source

  • Loulou@lemmy.mindoki.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Wasn’t it boulders like laying around on the asteroid? Held there by microgravity, and thus knocked in all directions at the impact?

    I mean debris from the impact, yes, “boulders” laying around, no I didn’t expect that :-)

    source

    • Elephant0991@lemmy.bleh.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      OK. Then. I guess the summary would be like, the asteroid was more loose than we though, and we had no idea how the boulders got ejected from the surface because our impact.

      source
• dustyData@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Unanticipated? I’m sure I can pull out a very serious and scientific simulation that predicted this exact event from 1979. It’s called Asteroids I think.

  source
• Diplomjodler@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Totally totally totally unanticipated that one. Like every discussion about asteroid defence ever anticipated exactly this kind of scenario.

  source
• gagewhylds@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Was no one involved alive in 1998? We had two movies about this.

  source

  • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    No one remembers deep impact

    source
• Skyrmir@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Sounds like the gravity tug or thruster methods might end up being the better solution.

  source
• freecandy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Pretty cool they were able to measure the change in velocity of an object 6 million miles away with millmeter/second resolution. Not cool that it only slowed down a few mm/second though

  source

  • Thorndike@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Actually, a few mm/sec is quite a lot. That could easily be more than enough to deflect an asteroid from hitting earth. That few mm/sec will accumulate over the time it takes the asteroid to travel six million miles.

    source

    • freecandy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Well you would need the vector to predict that, not just the speed, but pretty cool nonetheless

      source
• echodot@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Why is this a problem?

  The point is to deflect asteroids decades or even centuries out if they do that then the boulders they object will still be in the same gravitational area and will still move with the parent object. I don’t the force of impact is going to send them on completely new courses. And even if they did it’s unlikely that the new course would be the same as the old course, if anything it would be either the reverse of the old course, or a tangent to it.

  source

  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Asteroids may be detected very late when they’re already near earth. Breaking up a large rock into a lot of smaller ones may not be a big help. But all of this has been known for a very long time.

    source