I don’t get why the Macrons are feeding the trolls, why not ignore it and focus on something else, like PMs and whatnot
[deleted]
Submitted 1 day ago by brainyblondie@lemmy.world to [deleted]
Comments
carton_of_lions@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Bristlecone@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I don’t know man, I feel like ignoring these fucking horrible people isn’t the right way to go anymore. Like I feel like that’s what I’ve been doing my entire life and expecting them to eventually mature. They need to be publicly called out embarrassed and shown to be without the truth. Repeatedly if necessary, preferably as shamefully and as expensively as possible
Denjin@feddit.uk 1 day ago
That way madness lies. You can’t rationalise someone out of a position they weren’t rationalised into in the first place. You can’t debate someone into, for example, believing Brigitte Macron is a woman when they reached the opposite position in a complete absence of evidence of their belief.
TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Idk… especially considering there’re other legitimate things to actually feel uncomfortable about with their relationship.
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Why be so cowardly.
remon@ani.social 1 day ago
The timeline where two parody accounts play off each other?
brainyblondie@lemmy.world 1 day ago
[deleted]ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 1 day ago
Transphobia gone insane. Even cis women, the ones these fuckers claim to “protect”, get caught up in it.
remon@ani.social 1 day ago
Right, not “photo evidence” though. Leading Report is a joke news site.
expatriado@lemmy.world 1 day ago
haven’t follow the new closely, but i guess a chromosome test from a small blood sample would do, if that is what she want to do
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 day ago
This is for her role as a plaintiff in a defamation case against a USonian righteous in U.S. court.
Pechente@feddit.org 1 day ago
I read the BBC article but why would she even have to prove anything? That dumb ass conspiracy theorist should be obligated to prove their bullshit made up claim and lose the case.
FishFace@lemmy.world 1 day ago
This is the situation in the UK, where essentially defamation cases are guilty until proven innocent; if the defence you have to rest on is that what you said or wrote was true, you have to prove that to the court. It means that anyone who says anything that upsets the rich can be sued for defamation and has essentially no chance of prevailing.