Isn’t there already a special low-power part of phone chips designed to listen for wake words?
Analog computing is undergoing a resurgence
Submitted 21 hours ago by 33550336@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
https://bigthink.com/the-future/analog-computing-resurgence/
Comments
randomblock1@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 11 hours ago
— with a little help from AI.
I call nullshit.
prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 9 hours ago
pastermil@sh.itjust.works 16 hours ago
As cool as it sound at a glance, I fail to see the case they’re trying to build.
And of course, they have to sprinkle a little AI on it.
floo@retrolemmy.com 21 hours ago
No, it isn’t. There’s just a passing interest in retro technology
It’ll pass
sploosh@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
New, programmable analog chips that perform basic sound processing aren’t retro. The article is worth reading.
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Or, if you can’t read, Veritasium did a video: youtu.be/GVsUOuSjvcg
EnsignWashout@startrek.website 20 hours ago
@retrolemmy
username…hm…floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 hours ago
This has nothing to do with retro technology. This is about thinking “is using binary really the most efficient way to run every computation we need to do?”, which is really relevant today.
floo@retrolemmy.com 19 hours ago
Is it? Binary is not a “analog” vs “digital” thing. “Binary” existed in analog computing for a couple of centuries at least before the concept of “digital“ even existed.
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 19 hours ago
I would like more something like a GPU to become normal, except it’d be an analog unit for kinds of computation vastly more efficient this way, where you don’t need determinism. Some trigonometry and signal processing, perhaps even some of 3d graphics.
FishFace@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Relating this to carbon emissions is absurd. Your phone’s maximum power consumption is about 25W, of which sensors are a tiny, minuscule fraction. Running your phone at 25W for an entire year would allow you to drive a typical petrol car doing 40mpg for 250 miles on the same energy budget.
Reducing sensor power usage is good, but not for this reason.
frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 hours ago
There is a connection, but I don’t think it’s a satisfying one.
There’s some thought that the weights behind neural networks would take less power consumption if they were on analog chips. So yeah, it’s for LLMs to get bigger. Reducing CO2 emissions by not doing LLM slop is apparently off the table.
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 hours ago
Not to be argumentative, but has this ever been something the consumer market has done with an emerging “core” technology? I don’t see how this was ever realistically on the table.
AI slop is an unfortunate fact of life at this point. If it’s inevitable, we may as well make it as not terrible as possible.
paraphrand@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
This is how I understood it too.
macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
*gasoline or diesel. You cannot use petroleum as it needs to be refined.
FishFace@lemmy.world 13 minutes ago
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/petrol
gnu@lemmy.zip 7 hours ago
Petrol and gasoline are the same thing, it’s just different terminology.