Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Google tests ‘script blocking’ in Chrome Incognito to boost privacy

⁨46⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Pro@programming.dev⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩

https://chromestatus.com/feature/5188989497376768

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • killea@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Yep, noscript on firefox has been available for like 15 years. And it certainly does “break” some sites as it blocks scripts by default. It can be a pain, though I consider it the safest way

    source
    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Since the web works via a DOM (Document Object Model) and a document that needs to execute active content to display anything is broken, a webpage that needs JS to load the document can safely considered broken.

      source
      • killea@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I was trying to explain it more practically, but yes the web is a wasteland l.

        source
      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        You are talking about the difference between a website and a web application. Nothing is broken. Given that the alternative used the be Flash/Coldfusion I’m not sure this way is worse.

        source
    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I like uBlock Origin’s “medium mode.” It’s a nice middle ground

      source
  • n3cr0@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Doesn’t that break most websites? Is google trying to make the inkognito mode less useful?

    source
    • Pro@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Nope, matter of fact it fixed a lot of websites.

      source
    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      About 1/4 is broken, about 3/4 of the working ones show no popups/“paywalls”.

      source
  • Pro@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    YaY

    Even Firefox didn’t do that.

    source
    • NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      WTF you on about? Firefox has the NoScript extension, which Mozilla recommends?

      source
      • Pro@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        But does not install by default.

        Also while you can chrome has JavaScript permissions page, Firefox doesn’t. Which means you can’t control it.

        Matter of fact there was a long period of time before where Firefox browser would reenable the about:config JavaScript preference when you switch it off.

        source
  • WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Good on chrome I guess but if they are testing blocking js then I assume they are about to offer a less easy to block alternative

    source
  • individual@toast.ooo ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    dramatic irony

    source
    • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      mmyeah, 'Google' and 'privacy' in the same sentence is always funny.

      source