Two-hour screen time limit and curfews for children being considered by government

Comments

• thehatfox@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I think some parents feel a bit disempowered about how to actually make their kids healthier online.

  All of the time restrictions (and more) being proposed can already be done with parental controls that are built into devices now, and have been for years.

  The state setting digital curfews is a ridiculous level of overreach. The OSA and now this, we are heading in a dangerous direction.

  source
• rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Not a sneaky way to get identity verification into every platform at all. Completely can’t see what you’re doing there.

  source
• zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  How are curfews legal

  source
• SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I know the UK govt often tends to be quite authoritarian in its measures (like the proposed compulsory toothbrushing in schools, the cancelled complete tobacco ban), but in this case having a govt enforced time limit for kids might truly be the thing that’s needed to get them outdoors/reading again.

  source

  • lordnikon@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    my thing is the government needs to be authoritarian with companies on behalf of the people and very liberal with people directly. corporation are not people and are not subject to the human rights and freedoms. its only way to curtail exploitation and ensure those types of actions can have consequences.

    source
  • tenebrisnox@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    When was there compulsory toothbrushing in schools declared? Schools have been asked to teach children how to brush their teeth (which is something that used to be taught in post wat schools up until 1980s). Not compel children to brush teeth.

    source

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Iirc Labour had it in their manifesto(?)

      source

      • -> View More Comments