Where can I find Trumps drawing in the letter to Epstein?

Comments

• Carnelian@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I have not been following the situation very closely so I would confirm this with someone else, but I believe the actual letter has not been made public. A few imagines have been floating around that are “artist’s interpretations”, and occasionally these have been presented as Trump’s actual drawing in various forums.

  Again, could be off, been a busy week this is just what I gathered from skimming comments

  source

  • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    You’re right, best I can tell, WSJ only described the image, but has not published it. Here is an archive of the WSJ piece that Trump is suing about: archive.is/IUWMu

    source

    • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      [deleted]

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Tower@lemmy.zip ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    To provide additional context about “artist interpretation”, this is from the WSJ archive link:

    The letter bearing Trump’s name, which was reviewed by the Journal, is bawdy—like others in the album. It contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. A pair of small arcs denotes the woman’s breasts, and the future president’s signature is a squiggly “Donald” below her waist, mimicking pubic hair.

    source
  • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Do we have any direct confirmation that this is the letter and not one of the recreations that has been floating around?

      source
• cannedtuna@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Here

  Image

  source

  • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Thats not the real thing though, is it?

    source

    • cannedtuna@lemmy.world ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I like your optimism, but no, that really is it.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      No it’s not, WSJ didn’t release it. People are just very confident that whatever artistic interpretation of it they saw is “really it” and are getting upvoted for some reason.

      source
    • YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      It is

      source
  • shalafi@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Y’all believe anything you want to believe, don’t ya? And we make fun of FaceBook Boomers for falling for stupid shit.

    source
• sudo@programming.dev ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  It hasn’t been released yet. WSJ only got to look at the original which I believe is still in the DOJs possession.

  source
• Today@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I’ve also seen this one on letterhead with different spacing.

  Image

  source
• Today@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I think it was posted on lemmy a few days ago. I’ll look for it.

  source