crossposted from: https://piefed.social/post/1058332
The rise of green tech is feeding another environmental crisis
Submitted 3 weeks ago by solo@piefed.social to energy@slrpnk.net
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c30741j351go
Submitted 3 weeks ago by solo@piefed.social to energy@slrpnk.net
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c30741j351go
crossposted from: https://piefed.social/post/1058332
sxan@midwest.social 3 weeks ago
TL;DR companies making EV batteries don’t have good environmental processes.
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 3 weeks ago
Which, we knew. It’s why we shouldn’t run out to replace ice with ev but if you’re in the market for a new vehicle, then go ev. Plus this is an old old argument from conservatives, it’s been proven many times that the environmental impacts are offset after a year or so of driving compared to driving ICE
sxan@midwest.social 3 weeks ago
The article talks specifically about an EV battery plant in Nevada has drained all of the water and destroyed habitats. I don’t think that’s going to be offset by people driving EVs.
But that’s not necessarily an inerrant issue with EV batteries; it’s an issue with that particular battery maker having a poor environmental policy. It’s not the same as burning coal, where you can do it a little less bad but pollution is essentially unavoidable in the process.
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 3 weeks ago
ok so not news and a quick search zero mention of solid state batteries, I’ll pass
sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 3 weeks ago
But isn’t that part of what the EU law is trying to tackle
solo@slrpnk.net 3 weeks ago
I have the impression that in the EU what they care more about is having a constant supply and recycling. At least this was my understanding from the European Critical Raw Materials Act.
Maybe there’s another piece of legislation that tackles the issue of how these materials are mined, but I don’t know about it. So if anyone does, please share.
sxan@midwest.social 3 weeks ago
Maybe, but the article is 90% about a plant in Nevada; EU regulations aren’t going to affect that much.