Why not hire more judges?
Jury-free trials recommended to save courts from 'collapse'
Submitted 3 weeks ago by tal@lemmy.today to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm2m808kml0o
Comments
Delta_V@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
echodot@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Not everyone can pull off a wig.
catty@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Let’s use AI as the jury!!!1 Palantir, where are you?
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Just call more Juries??? It’s not like the court has to pay for them except for transport
LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 3 weeks ago
It’s getting people who are willing and able to do it. It’s surprisingly hard.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
That’s interesting. You just get paid time off work to sit and play on your phone in a lobby most of the time.
Denjin@lemmings.world 3 weeks ago
Number of juries isn’t the problem itself. It’s availability of court buildings, lack of legal professionals to try cases in court, cost of staffing and services for those buildings and the increased time it takes to bring a jury trial to court (it takes on average of 284 days for a case to move through the magistrates court and 695 days through the crown court according to the National Audit Office).
This particular proposal, part of a range, is to have an extra tier in the crown court to deal with lower category cases, such as fraud and minor theft cases so that the bigger, more complicated violent crimes, rapes and murders can be prioritised.
Also worth noting, we don’t have right to jury trial enshrined in UK law, only the right to a fair trial. I actually think this could help reduce the issue but the biggest problem is lack of funding.
Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’m sorry, but do you see all this? All the is ass they have to haul? UwU
CritFail@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Just casually removing the right to be judged by a panel of your peers.
manicdave@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Your peers don’t follow the party line
russ@cupoftea.social 3 weeks ago
@manicdave @midgephoto @CritFail this is the way.