Submitted 1 day ago by leckiesock@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/eef29f43-b493-4051-a7fe-d62a74c5dbd5.jpeg
Session is pretty neat considering that it doesn’t require a cell phone number, unlike Signal messenger, which beats the purpose of anonymity.
I just purchased $20 in tokens. Perhaps one day in the future more people will start using it and nodes will start springing up all over, making the service much faster.
Has anyone else used or still uses Session? What are your thoughts? I think it has potential if more people have it a go.
I think it was a great idea, but poorly executed. I prefer using simpleX, personally.
Signal was never supposed to provide anonymity.
I like the federated network design and that the client is really polished. If only the cryptography in session protocol wasn’t broken I’d consider actually using it.
How signal beats the purpose of anonymity. Thry never share or sell you phone number. Also you can use a temporary phone number also.
renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 1 day ago
I just read a bit about it on their website, and I don’t understand why it needs to have anything to do with cryptocurrency…?
orclev@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
I dove into their FAQ which explains it. I don’t agree with their logic, but the core idea seems to be that in order to run their equivalent of a TOR relay you have to stake a certain amount of their crypto, and you periodically receive some of the crypto as a reward for running the node. The theory is that the more nodes there are, the less crypto is available on the market and the more expensive it will become to acquire enough crypto to create new nodes. It’s all supposed to make it prohibitively expensive to control a significant amount of the network.
The fatal flaw in the reasoning is the assumption that anyone will actually care enough about their crypto to drive the price up. With no central authority setting a price for the crypto the price becomes whatever anyone is willing to buy or sell it for. Their fatal assumption is that scarcity automatically generates value. It does not. A thing needs some kind of value in addition to scarcity to become valuable.
sramder@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
My fraudy-sense is tingling… that said, I tossed $6 at some German company a few weeks ago and patted myself on the back.
Remember kids, you can donate to the Signal foundation… Moxie Marlinspike is an international treasure #changemymind 😉
Quik@infosec.pub 23 hours ago
From their blog:
(They are now switching from OXEN/the Oxen network to their own to be able to better control the features of their hosting network)