Sony, owner of "Naughty Dog", is suing a small game developer "Naughty Cat" in HK for trademark infringement.

Comments

• Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Sometimes you just gotta ask yourself if the juice is worth the squeeze.

  source

  • CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Meow that’s right

    source
• duchess@feddit.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Naughty Dog has been a shitty name for a studio in the first place.

  source

  • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Reminds me of DogFart productions 😅 If you don’t know what that is, don’t look it up.

    source
• echodot@feddit.uk ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The first, dominant element of the two marks, NAUGHTY, is identical,” Sony said. “The second elements, DOG and CAT, are highly similar in that both refer to house pets

  That has to be the most flimsy lawsuit I’ve ever heard. Any lawyer that can win with that case is a freaking genius.

  source

  • bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Naughty Spiderbro

    Cause I keep spiderbros

    source
  • Uruanna@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Surely there must be a Naughty Bunny somewhere that could shoot that right back at them? Maybe not in video game trademarks.

    source

    • echodot@feddit.uk ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I guarantee that Naughty Bunny makes sex toys.

      source
• Nikls94@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Sony doing a Nintendo.

  source

  • cRazi_man@europe.pub ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    “Naughty publisher”

    source
• sgh@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’d understand if it wasn’t a game developer, but this looks like a clear case of piggybacking.

  Also, fuck gambling.

  source