Denmark to tackle deepfakes by giving people copyright to their own features

Comments

• deafboy@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Can’t wait for the first pair of twins to sue each other.

  source

  • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Or just doppelgangers.

    source
• Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  The Danish government said on Thursday it would strengthen protection against digital imitations of people’s identities

  Good call. 👍

  source
• R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Crazy that this wasn’t already the standard years ago.

  source

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    It’s not the standard because it will likely have a LOT of unintended consequences.

    How do you share evidence of police brutality if they can use copyright to take down the video? How do newspapers print pictures of people if they have to get the rightsholders permission first? How do we share photos of Elon Musk doing a Nazi salute if he can just sue every site that posts it for unauthorized use of his likeness?

    Unless this has some extremely stringent and well written limitations, it has the potential to be a very bad idea.

    source

    • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I would assume those would fall under fair use of some kind, but you’re right that those fair use laws would need some scrutiny before implementing this. I’m still cautiously optimistic about it, but yeah if I was a lawmaker I’d be thinking hard about the potential misuses of it for sure.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  So will this mean every professional photographer will have to share copyrights with the human subjects of photos?

  source

  • justineie_bobeanie@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    It doesn’t seem to be the case. As far as I can tell, the law only covers realistic digital imitations of a person’s likeness (deepfakes), with an exception for parody and satire. If you appear in public that is effectively license for someone to capture your image.

    source
• levzzz@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Can’t wait for celebrities to sue lookalikes

  source

  • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    [The proposal] defines a deepfake as a very realistic digital representation of a person, including their appearance and voice.

    The government said the new rules would not affect parodies and satire, which would still be permitted.

    Seems like they’ve already thought about this, and the law will cover only digital clones, not human lookalikes, and there are still fair-use carve outs.

    source
  • Nalivai@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Fair use or something

    source
• SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I like this

  source