Meta Filed a Lawsuit Against The Entity Behind a Nudify App.

Comments

• LovableSidekick@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  To me it’s weird to treat artificially generated nudity differently from if somebody painted a naked body with a real person’s face on it - which I assume would be legally protected freedom of expression.

  source
• My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  This is a case where every other organism on earth, except for maybe the junk bug, looks at humans with a confused air of disdain. Like, why did you manufacture this intractable problem by mandating clothing and shaming nudity in the first place?

  source

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Like, why did you manufacture this intractable problem by mandating clothing and shaming nudity in the first place?

    You think humans invented clothing because of shame?

    That’s completely backwards, we invented clothing for protection, and not seeing everything all the time led to shame when someone could see us.

    Like, I’m pretty sure hermit crabs feel something similar to shame when they don’t have a shell, they need something to drive them to not only protect them, but to ensure they can reproduce and raise their young. That’s why humans instinctually get weird about exposed genitals and boobs, those are the most important parts of a human from an evolutionary perspective.

    I get what you’re trying to say, it’s just you’re going about it completely backwards

    source

    • My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Nah, I get that exposed flesh isn’t always comfortable or safe and the practical solution is to just steal the skin of some other animal (or convert crude oil into super soft knit fabrics). I’m just of the personal mindset that if someone is comfortable enough in their own skin that they are completely fine going about their business in the buff, that the rest of society shouldn’t lose its shit and just be like, “k whatever u do u naked person wear sunblock.”

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Don’t forget decorator crabs.

    source
• Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Can I sue meta for non consensual tracking and making it so I can’t even look at a picture 90% of the fucking time because it’s account gated to Instagram?

  source
• jeena@piefed.jeena.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I thought they hopped on trumps post truth wagon and removed all the fact checkers, why are they making a fuzz about this specific topic?

  source

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    It makes AI look bad and is the leading example people are using when proposing legislation to regulate AI. If they can end this most prominent one, not only do they look like they’re fighting for the users, but they help keep the gvmt from meddling with whatever henious shit they want to do with AI (by removing the best argument the pro-regulation groups have right now)

    source

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Note: this is only the best argument they have right now because politicians will never be persuaded by people bringing up Palantir’s war crimes.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Sibbo@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Meta is actually doing something positive for once.

  source

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    It’s not for the right reason…

    Beta was better than VHS, but Beta didn’t have porn, so everyone got VCRs.

    Meta is so big they could get sued for letting users openly make porn like this, but they don’t want everyone using the ones who can make porn. Because that’s the biggest threat to their advantage in the market.

    If Meta thought they could get away with it, they’d dive dick first into porn.

    source

    • skribe@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Beta most certainly did have porn. VHS’s advantage was that it had a longer record time (therefore more porn).

      source