If you want your group memberships to be known only by the group members, use Signal.
WhatsApp provides no cryptographic management for group messages
Submitted 1 year ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
ouch@lemmy.world 1 year ago
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
Or P2P stuff like Briar :)
coconut@programming.dev 1 year ago
Just use signal is not a valid statement in a world where vast majority of people aren’t using (and won’t use) it. I have been trying to get people to install it and have a total of 6 over several years. They only use it to communicate with me.
ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 1 year ago
Or simplex.chat where there are no identifiers like phone numbers or any other identifier.
Security review was done by trail of bits.
sykaster@feddit.nl 1 year ago
Just be sure to add only the people you want to be there. I’ve heard someone people add others and it’s a bit messy
tias@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
How bad can it be, it’s not like we’re sharing state secrets
Bahnd@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Or Matrix (warning some assembly required)
Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 1 year ago
I actually found xmpp to be a breeze compared to most Matrix solutions.
Synapse is bloated, dendrite sucks and conduit is in perpetual beta and the uwu forks die too fast.
XMPP:
- Install Snikket
- Reverse proxy
- Done
new_guy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
WhatsApp isn’t the only messenger lacking cryptographic assurances for new group members. In 2022, a team that included some of the same researchers that analyzed WhatsApp found that Matrix—an open source and proprietary platform for chat and collaboration clients and servers—also provided no cryptographic means for ensuring only authorized members join a group. The Telegram messenger, meanwhile, offers no end-to-end encryption for group messages, making the app among the weakest for ensuring the confidentiality of group messages.
lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Duh, how else is Zuckerberg going to spy on you and sell your data back to you?
wischi@programming.dev 1 year ago
It’s not called Meta data by accident 🤣
Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today 1 year ago
Highlighting the main issue here (from the article):