.tar.xz

Comments

• abfarid@startrek.website ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  No way media compressed 5x.

  source

  • Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Maybe they store images as uncompressed .bmp for some reason

    source

    • Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      bmp should not compress more than other media files. jpeg, png, etc. can compress so much because they are lossy

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • hmmm@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Why are you surpried? It’s actually possible. You just need so much computing power like around 64 GB ram and High End CPU to Pack and Unpack both.

    source

    • abfarid@startrek.website ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Because modern media formats are already compressed by default and have very little redundancy in them.

      source
  • reev@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Was thinking the same thing

    source
• alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  What if it’s on a BTRFS --compress-force=zstd:22 compressed subvolume?

  source
• superkret@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Is this lossless?

  source
• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Ew, WinRAR.

  source

  • Pregnenolone@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    WinRAR got me through some hard times. She might be filthy, but she did the job

    source

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      She’s proprietary nagware, and 7-Zip is better in every way.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I use Windows in-built extract

    source