Increasing airport size as a way to stimulate economic growth seems like dated thinking to me. Flights are increasingly not used for business travel as communications technology has advanced. All you’re really doing is trying to maintain hub status for London which doesn’t drive economic activity outside of the airport industry.
Heathrow needs a third runway as much as it needs a rollercoaster. A huge construction project, with all the emissions that brings, that paves over houses, green spaces and the M25 (on a bridge).
Finally, I guess we can see why Labour whipped against the environment bill last week.
Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Some day I’d like to hear about a forest the size of London getting planted without there being a gigantic airport built.
YungOnions@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
*…org.uk/…/biggest-ever-tree-planting-year-for-nor…
Some key figures from the 2024 Forestry research summary:
…gov.uk/…/forestry-facts-figures-2024/
There are now 3.28 million hectares of woodland in the UK (as of March 2024)
Woodland area in the UK now represents 13.5% of total land area
20,660 hectares of new woodland were created in the UK in 2023/24 (compared to 12,960 in 22/23)
There was a 59% increase in new planting and 28% increase in restocking in the UK in 2023/24
Hopefully that’ll make you feel slightly happier :)
Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 1 hour ago
🥰
ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Yeah but, how can you squeeze profit from that?
Redderthanmisty@lemmygrad.ml 1 day ago
Charge people for breathing oxygen, like that one Dr who episode.
FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
Ditto