How annoying is it to connect to VPN/use Tailscale instead of being able to access the service directly?

Submitted ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com⁩ to ⁨selfhosted@lemmy.world⁩

So I’m just being introduced to the concept of using a VPN or something like Tailscale to access one’s services, instead of opening the services directly to the web, but I’m thinking for streaming purposes or just accessing your services on the run, isn’t it an annoyance having to connect to your home network all the time? Or do you keep the VPN running?

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

Dust0741@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
I keep it running always. Partly to access stuff at home, and party to get the ad-blocking from pihole.

Do not expose stuff unless you fully understand the security risks

source
- Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  How’s the power draw on mobile devices?
  
  source
  - avidamoeba@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Not noticeable with always-on Tailscale with the default split-tunnel mode. That is when Tailscale is only used to access Tailscale machines and everything else is routed via the default route.
    
    source
  - farcaller@fstab.sh ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    For the last 10 days tailscale clocked 1% battery on my phone. I honestly didn’t even consider turning it off for battery savings.
    
    source
  - Dust0741@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Its not bad using the official wireguard app. Its definitely noticable. On the android battery screen it’ll show around 5% after a full day of use and it on always
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
OneCardboardBox@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

isn’t it an annoyance having to connect to your home network all the time?

It’s less annoying than the gnawing fear that my network might be an easy target for attackers.

source
merde@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Image

🤔

source
zelifcam@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

How annoying is it to connect to VPN/use Tailscale

I think it’s very important to separate a random “VPN” solution to using Tailscale.

instead of being able to access the service directly?

Focusing on Tailscale. Who turns off Tailscale? It is “directly” connecting to your service or app or whatever. That’s the whole point.

source
- Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Probably just me that’s confused. I thought Tailscale was similar to WireGuard but much easier to set up. So one connects to the services directly, and not just the general home network (like a VPN) where you then enter whatever address you need to access the service?
  
  source
  - BearOfaTime@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Tailscale is wireguard (it uses the wireguard protocols, even says so on the box), just with a centralized resolver to make things easier to setup and manage.
    
    I’m not sure what you’re saying with the rest of your comment, as Tailscale is a mesh network, not a VPN as most people think of it.
    
    It encrypts your traffic, but only into the network of which your device is a member. You can’t even see any devices, or networking, outside the Tailscale network, unless a device is configured as a Subnet router. Then you can see devices n the network which the Subnet Router links together.
    
    For example, you have 3 machines, a laptop on mobile data, and 2 desktops on your home LAN. One desktop and the laptop have Tailscale, they can communicate over Tailscale to each other, but the laptop cannot connect to the second desktop because it’s on a different network, since there’s no routing between Tailscale and your home LAN.
    
    You then configure Subnet Routing on the desktop that has Tailscale, now your laptop can connect o any device on the home LAN, so long as the desktop is running and Tailscale is up.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - signalsayge@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    It can be just like you’ve said. You can also run tailscale directly on the system hosting a service and access it directly over the tailscale network.
    
    source
Dust0741@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
For an external VPN like mullvad, I run my own proxy. Again it’s only available from my VPN or inside my network.

It uses socks5 and gluetun docket containers and in apps that support proxies, I can add my proxy to it and it’ll route that traffic through the paid VPN.

Or, a work profile (see shelter) or androids new private spaces. If you have private spaces, it uses a seperate network. So if you have a VPN installed outside the private space, it won’t work on apps inside the space. So, what you could do is have a paid VPN inside private spaces, and use it and a web browser or whatever there, and use your server’s VPN outside the private space.

Lmk if you want any of my docker composes

source
- Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Very interesting. Didn’t know this was a possibility. I don’t need anything now but thanks for offering, might get back to you
  
  source
- theorangeninja@lemmy.today ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  This sounds very interesting. I always wondered if I could use a paid VPN together with Tailscale or Netbird. But I’m not sure I understood how you set this up. And what are Android private spaces?
  
  source
  - Dust0741@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    I have gluetun+socks5 containea running, then in an app, I put in localip:port into a proxy field. Then that app will use that connection for internet. Browsers on desktop also support proxies. So if you want a specific browser to always use the VPN, this is a very simple way to do that.
    
    source.android.com/docs/security/…/private-space
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
jhoward@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Use Tailscale, for the most part it’s pretty transparent. As long as all the magic DNS stuff is setup correctly, I can access all my internal services by name and it just works.

source
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Sucks a high hard one if you plan for others to use your services too. If it’s just you it’s not that annoying

source
Agility0971@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Im using tailscale and have all my devices connected through it. Im not exposung any services in particular, just handy to be able to ssh around

source
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
If you have an iPhone, it’s a pain over Tailscale because Tailscale frequently likes to disconnect for various reasons and this isn’t something Tailscale can fix, it’s something with the way Apple manages background processes.

If you’d like an alternative, you can host your services directly to the internet via a reverse proxy like Caddy or Nginx, and then use mTLS to secure that access with a certificate you load only onto your devices.

source
irotsoma@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Depends on how secure the application and the security you use in front of the application such as reverse proxies, load balancers, etc. If you are exposing a web application with no SSL, no two factor with, or something in a beta state or if you can’t trust your ISP not to create man-in-the-middle attacks for advertising and collecting information to sell which also likely introduces security vulnerabilities, then that could be a problem and a VPN or similar might be a big help.

source
InverseParallax@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Not much, I have services that run both externally and only over wg.

Only issue with wg is sometimes I have to shut it off for things like multicastdns, or otherwise that try to look around the network or wifi.

source