Statistitians are good people, though I need more data points to say anything conclusive
Our bffs
Submitted 6 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/38052073-ab4e-4d6a-a417-ef91ee0df729.jpeg
Comments
Zehzin@lemmy.world 6 months ago
marcos@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Just to point out, but you need to make sure your data is unbiased much more than you need a lot of points.
merari42@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Can you at least say how your prior belief distribution has shifted or been reaffirmed given the observed data points?
Zehzin@lemmy.world 6 months ago
That would be pretty Bayesed
kender242@lemmy.world 6 months ago
“Trust in numbers” was an eye opening book I had to read for a university course.
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691208411/trust-in-numbers
The idea that “It’s difficult to get numbers to tell you the truth” despite how people tend to think hard data is not falsifiable - was my main take.
undercrust@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
For a really good riff on this same idea, I like “How to Lie With Statistics” by Darrell Huff, and it’s all illustrated!
Great, easy to understand breakdown of how statistics can be manipulated.
DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 6 months ago
I honestly think that book should be required high school reading.
AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 6 months ago
As a biochemist who is better at stats than the average biochemist (which is concerning, because I’m not that great), I greatly appreciate statisticians telling us off when we’re fools.
Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
The second most useful thing I learned from statistics courses was the statistics. The first was just how terrible most people are in their application.