Comment on Lemmy devs are considering making all votes public - have your say

• empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  You don’t even have serial downvoters. You just consistently post the worst possible political pisstakes repeatedly and constantly and nobody likes them when they run across it every time.

  source

  • UniversalMonk@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You just consistently post the worst possible political pisstakes repeatedly

    Strange that you would say that. I haven’t posted any political articles to this community. This is the fediverse community.

    nobody likes them when they run across it every time.

    Really? So an article about a ninety year old woman, who finally graduates college, posted to my own sub, with 3 subscribers, and got 9 votes within a minute of posting is political? That doesn’t seem like a political “pisstake.”

    Or 13 downvotes in my own educational sub about a college that gives out 3-year degrees. It has 2 subscribers in that sub. That doesn’t seem like a political “pisstake.”

    Or 14 downvotes about a program serving underprivileged children and helping them go to college. and the downvotes were within 2 minutes of posting. To a sub that has 2 subscribers. That doesn’t seem like a political “pisstake.”

    And since all my postings to a political sub are about third parties, from legit news orgs, seems kind of a stretch to call them “political pisstakes.”

    But wait, I haven’t posted any of those articles to this community. So strange how you would know so much about what I post.

    Of course, posting history is public. But I haven’t checked your post history, because I don’t care. Strange that you would check mine. And then not mention all of the non-political posts.

    You know, whats really weird too? I posted some articles to the c/science committee. And even some posters there commented on how strange it was that my posts were being downvoted so much and so fast, when the articles weren’t political at all.

    Luckily the science people are cool, and the upvotes quickly outnumbered the downvotes.

    But yeah, they were definitely curious about why so many downvotes so quickly on neutral science reporting.

    But meh, probably just a coincidence.

    I think maybe you are right. Because for sure there wouldn’t be an incel loser who is so butthurt about my not voting for his candidate that he’d follow me around and downvote articles and take screenshots of how much I post or set up alternate accounts just to engage with me after I blocked him.

    That is so strange. There is no way a loser would be so pathetic to do that. All because he doesn’t like the Green Party. So thank you for letting me realize my mistake.

    It would be just too crazy that an incel loser like that would follow me around. I mean, sure he can’t get a girlfriend, but hey, I’m sure he’s not THAT mad at the world. :)

    source

    • zecg@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Touch sum fucken grass dude

      source

      • UniversalMonk@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Or how about I use a forum that doesn’t have incels that get off on downvoting people. There is that.

        source
    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      That’s a lot of words man

      source

      • UniversalMonk@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Well it does take about 20 seconds to read, I so can understand your frustration.

        source