Imagine arguing that it’s actually good for kids to watch women being harassed. Peak incel.
Comment on Some YouTube channels for children are uploading obscene videos.
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
According to the article, the videos feature nudity and possibly sexual harassment. Sexual harassment is unfortunately a fact of life, and it’s probably better that children recognise it, and see it condemned in the media they watch, than not know what it is at all. And you would have to be a puritan to think that children seeing naked people is somehow so terrible.
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
What is a ‘race realist’?
werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Maybe they realize race is not a biological term but rather a racist term. It’s a way to distinguish us from them because we are darker or are shorter or taller than the standard sized/colored/shaped group.
Race does not equal species. We are all one single species, the homosapiens.
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
We need a term to distinguish people with different skin tones as they are treated differently. You can call it race or skin color, it doesn’t really matter, it’s just a semantic argument.
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
If you bothered reading the very short article, it would be very clear that people are deliberately getting children subscribers than replacing the flow of new content with attempts to brainwash them or expose them to obscenity.
RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
But their channels for children… not just random channels. There is a difference.