Comment on Romanian oligarch hired Hunter Biden to influence US policy, special counsel says
Lauchs@lemmy.world 1 month agoMultiple folks have challenged it, every ruling prior to this had ruled that this was a nonsense claim.
We both know it’s not actually a constitutional challenge, it’s a delay in the hope trump wins the presidency and can, once again, avoid repercussions for his actions.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 month ago
SCOTUS may have a different take this one. Maybe not. To me it’s telling only Thomas wrote about it.
Lauchs@lemmy.world 1 month ago
And zero other justices decided it was a legitimate enough thought to agree with. (Typically, when a Justice writes an opinion like that, others will also sign it. It is telling that none chose to do so.)
But, if we are taking judges rulings as gospel, does that mean both of us admit that donald trump has committed sexual assault and in a different sexual criminal case, paid hush money to the pornstar with whom he cheated on his wife? Just curious!
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
He was found liable for sexual assault. Yes, he paid Josh money to a porn star
Lauchs@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
So when it comes to the special counsel, you are willing to Unequivocally say he was appointed illegally. When it comes to trump, you won’t say he committed sexual assault only that he was found liable? Or are you just mis-speaking?