Comment on Romanian oligarch hired Hunter Biden to influence US policy, special counsel says
Lauchs@lemmy.world 5 weeks agoSo when it comes to the special counsel, you are willing to Unequivocally say he was appointed illegally. When it comes to trump, you won’t say he committed sexual assault only that he was found liable? Or are you just mis-speaking?
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
I don’t have a dog in this fight. Why would I take a hard stance over an issue that is best left to the court?
When you look at the evidence, I don’t believe he committed sexual assault. As someone who worked in the legal system for years, I have never seen such a lack of evidence win in court. She didn’t even have basic facts such as the year, the time, the day, etc. It was just her statement as evidence.
He was not found guilty of a crime, he was found legally liabel.
Lauchs@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
But you’re willing to, despite multiple precedents and repeated legal confirmation, declare the special counsel illegal because one wild judge said so.
It’s neat.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Do you confuse me with Judge Cannon? I am not Judge Cannon. What I did is provide a cite to explain to you the differences
Lauchs@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Yes and it doesn’t really defend Cannon’s decision so much as say that it is different from Weiss.
But you’ve decided that despite all other rulings, precedent etc that Cannon’s ruling means Smith is illegal.
BUT when a court comes to an opinion you don’t like and finds trump guilty of sexual assault, well, that’s a matter for the courts and you don’t believe them.
Basically, a nonsense ruling that flies in the face of precedent/common sense/previous cases but supports your side, obviously correct.
But a court and jury finds trump committes sexual assault, well, y’know, that may or may not have happened etc.
It’s almost like the facts don’t matter, all that matters is whether the ruling is good or bad for your side. Weird.