Comment on The bizarre secrets I found investigating corrupt Winamp skins

• LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Nah, browsers are sandboxed to absolute shit it is such a pain in the ass to make an extension just to do a phishing attack or to buy the ownership of one to introduce malicious code.

  At most an extension with really broad permissions like read/write contents of any page (a fact that is made obvious upon installation) can replace a link to take you to a phishing page to harvest creds, but thanks to SSL and HTTPS it won’t even work without fifty some odd warnings

  source

  • Plopp@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    You live by that and I’ll live by the advice I’ve seen from infosec professionals that recommend as few add-ons as possible due to security concerns. But yes, browsers are getting more secure over time and that’s good.

    source

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I’m an cybersec MSc and an infosec professional.

      You obviously shouldn’t install closed source or otherwise shady extensions from dodgy authors you don’t know, but on the whole there is very little they can do that you should worry about.

      Most “advice” comes from people who want to sell you something and the infosec industry is mostly a scam to drain B2B procurement budgets plus a few gay furry researchers at defcon and actual malware authors who do something, unless they just write crappy .NET junk.

      Worrying about stuff like this in browser is akin to using a VPN on public WiFi to avoid MITM attacks, there’s nothing wrong with it but there’s basically nothing to actually worry about there.

      source

      • Plopp@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        You obviously shouldn’t install closed source or otherwise shady extensions from dodgy authors you don’t know, but on the whole there is very little they can do that you should worry about.

        Sorry if I’m nitpicky or confused here. You just said it’s obvious that you shouldn’t install closed sourced or otherwise shady extensions. Do you think a normie knows and cares if an extension is open source? And how do they know if an extension is “shady”? And what about legit extensions that get bought by shady people and turned into shady ones long after they’ve been installed and the user base trusts it?

        source
  • kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I mean, couldn’t an addon just read the password you put into a login field, or send in a request, and send it off to their servers?

    source

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      If an add-on is modifying contents of pages it shouldn’t or of the clipboard when it shouldn’t, you would have to give it explicit permission at install time, i.e. “This extension can: Read and Modify Data on all sites you visit: Read and Modify contents of the clipboard.”

      Obviously a simple URL redirector for wikipedia requesting access to this data is absurd and would be an immediate red flag. The reason this very thing doesn’t happen more often, is because frankly you’d have to be so computer illiterate to get to that stage that it is much easier to just phish you with basic Facebook profile info for much greater gains.

      This is also the reason most “hacks” nowadays are either supply-side or phishing, shit is just too secure, no fun. We should bring back ActiveX.

      source

      • Plopp@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Obviously a simple URL redirector for wikipedia requesting access to this data is absurd and would be an immediate red flag.

        To you, yes it should be. But it does require knowledge about how websites and browsers work that most people don’t have. I’d be very surprised if 50% of people have any idea what those permissions actually do and what would be reasonable for different extensions to have.

        source

        • -> View More Comments