Yeah. I just meant AMD cpus used to easily overheat if your cooling system had an issue. My ryzen 7 3700x has been freaking awesome though. Feels more solid than any PC I’ve built. And it’s fast AF. I think I saved over $150 when comparing to a similarly rated Intel CPU. And the motherboards generally seem cheaper for AMD too. I would feel ripped off with Intel even without the crashing issues
Comment on There is no fix for Intel’s crashing 13th and 14th Gen CPUs — any damage is permanent
mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months agoThe only problem they ever had was back in the day they overheated easily.
That’s not true. It was just last year that some of the Ryzen 7000 models were burning themselves out from the insides at default settings (within AMD specs) due to excessive SoC voltage. They fixed it through new specs and working with board manufacturers to issue new BIOS, and I think they eventually gave in to pressure to cover the damaged units. I guess we’ll see if Intel ends up doing the same.
I generally agree with your sentiment, though. :)
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 months ago
tal@lemmy.today 3 months ago
Problem is that it’s getting extremely hard to get more single-threaded performance out of a chip, and this is one of the few ways to do so. And a lot of software is not going to be rewritten to use multiple cores. In some cases, it’s fundamentally impossible to parallelize a particular algorithm.
ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 3 months ago
That was asus applying too much voltage to the x3d skus
mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months ago
Where do you think Asus got the specs for that voltage?
ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Then why were there essentially no blow ups from other motherboard manufacturers? Tell me if my information on this is wrong, but when there’s only one brand causing issues then they’re the ones to blame for it.
mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months ago
Then why were there essentially no blow ups from other motherboard manufacturers?
I believe there were, including MSI, who also released corrected BIOS versions.
(But even if that was not the case, it could be explained by Asus being the only board maker to use the high end of a voltage range allowed by AMD, or by Asus having a significantly larger market share.)
frezik@midwest.social 3 months ago
Not from AMD. From the autogenerated transcript (with minor edits where it messed up the names of things):
amd’s official recommendation [f]or the cut off now is 1.3 volts but the board vendors can still technically set whatever they want so even though the [AGESA] update can lock down and start restricting the voltage the problem is Asus their 1.3 number manifests itself as something like 1.34 volts so it is still on the high side
This was pretty much all on motherboard manufacturers, and ASUS was particularly bad (out scumbaging MSI, good job, guys).
At the start of this Intel mess, it was thought they had a similar issue on their hands and motherboard manufactures just needed to get in line, but it ended up going a lot deeper.
mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months ago
That doesn’t contradict anything I wrote. Note that it says [AMD’s] cutoff is now 1.3 volts, implying that it wasn’t before this mess began. Note also that the problem was worse on Asus boards because their voltage tolerance was looser than it should be, not because they used a voltage target beyond the specified cutoff.
SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 3 months ago
I think he was referring to “back-in-the-day” when Athlons, unlike the competing Pentium 3 and 4 CPUs of the day, didn’t have any thermal protections and would literally go up in smoke if you ran them without cooling.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRn8ri9tKf8
mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months ago
When I started using computers, I wasn’t aware of any thermal protections in popular CPUs. Do you happen to know when they first appeared in Intel chips?
SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 3 months ago
Pentium 2 and 3 had rudimentary protection. They would simply shutdown if they got too hot. Pentium 4 was the first one that would throttle down clock speeds.
Anything before that didn’t have any protection as far as I’m aware.
RdVortex@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Some motherboards did have overheating protection back then tough. Personally I had my Athlon XP computer randomly shut down several times back then, because the system had some issue, where fans would randomly start slowing down and eventually completely stop. This then triggered overheat protection of the motherboard, which simply cut the power as soon as the temperature was too hight.