Then you weren’t reading clearly. Here’s another source directly from the US Courts:
If you still can’t figure it out from this, then there’s just no getting through to you at all. That’s nobody’s problem but your own.
Comment on Girl, 7, 'Too Young' for First Amendment Rights, Punished for 'Racist' BLM Drawing
Kaboom@reddthat.com 3 months agoEven your linked articlevsays it is. You just cant make specific and clear threats that you have the ability to follow through on.
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 3 months ago
Kaboom@reddthat.com 3 months ago
This wasnt an obscenity
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 3 months ago
Considering what is “obscene” changes in society over time, it could be argued, which is not protected.
I agree that there’s nothing wrong by the image and the child seemed to mean well, but if it is deemed obscene by society it is very much not protected.
Definition of obscene: www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/obscene
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 3 months ago
Correct.
What the kid said won’t pass the sniff test in court. It’s overly restrictive on political ideology.