Comment on Girl, 7, 'Too Young' for First Amendment Rights, Punished for 'Racist' BLM Drawing

• Kaboom@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Even your linked articlevsays it is. You just cant make specific and clear threats that you have the ability to follow through on.

  source

  • wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Correct.

    What the kid said won’t pass the sniff test in court. It’s overly restrictive on political ideology.

    source
  • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Then you weren’t reading clearly. Here’s another source directly from the US Courts:

    www.uscourts.gov/…/what-does

    If you still can’t figure it out from this, then there’s just no getting through to you at all. That’s nobody’s problem but your own.

    source

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This wasnt an obscenity

      source

      • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Considering what is “obscene” changes in society over time, it could be argued, which is not protected.

        I agree that there’s nothing wrong by the image and the child seemed to mean well, but if it is deemed obscene by society it is very much not protected.

        Definition of obscene: www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/obscene

        source