Comment on Work from home

• dev_null@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  You said “No matter what app it is” which is the point of my confusion. So you actually meant “apps that use data”, that’s fair enough, thank you for the clarification.

  your employer is still required to provide you with the tools necessary to complete your job

  Ok, so is the employer required to provide me a phone or not? Because you say they are, but also they can refuse, and then they just need to reimburse the data usage. So are they required to or not? Because if they are allowed to refuse then it doesn’t seem like a requirement at all.

  source

  • icedterminal@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It doesn’t matter if it’s apps that use data or apps that don’t use data. If your employer requires you to install an app on your personal phone, you can refuse. It is your legal right. If you choose to exercise your legal rights, your employer must provide you with an alternative method that doesn’t involve your personal phone. Whatever they choose.

    If you agree to installing a work related app on your personal phone, you must be compensated. If they refuse to compensate, you’re back to square one. They must provide you alternatives.

    If your employer refuses to supply you with the tools to complete your job and/or refuse to compensate personal phone use for work related reasons, they are breaking the law. If they fire you for exercising your rights, it’s unlawful termination.

    source

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Ok, so it’s not that they can refuse to provide a device, it’s that if you voluntarily agree to use your personal device, then they have to provide compensation (for the data, etc.). Your original comment said they can refuse to provide a device, hence my confusion.

      source

      • icedterminal@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        No, they can still refuse to provide a device as my original comment states. Since my employer refused to do so, they came up with an alternative without any additional input from me. They completely side stepped the app requirement by using a little key chain once they reached out to Cisco.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Just look at it as wear and tear. Doesn’t matter how miniscule it may be it’s still eating up your storage and battery life in addition to battery charge. Sure you could charge at work too for battery charge but as miniscule as it is it’s still killing your battery life.

    Also, don’t give corporations any leeway because they WILL take advantage of the employee given the chance. For every single rule and regulation that helps the employee someone had to spill blood to achieve it.

    source

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That’s what I think, which is why I’m asking icedterminal where did they get the info that the employer can refuse to provide a phone, it doesn’t seem right to me.

      source

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Maybe in their country? Weird one.

        source