The point is that he had/has an interest in keeping Russia happy, that means that everything WL has published since taking Russia’s money is probably only to the detriment of the west.
That doesn’t mean that WL publishes false/fake information, however true propaganda is still propaganda and serves a political agenda.
By allying themselves with Russia, WL has made it clear that they are only really focusing on the west’s transgressions, and will mostly ignore Russia’s.
They are no longer impartial activists, they have taken sides, but still claim to be impartial.
That is the issue
kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 4 months ago
The connection from Assange to Russia was laid out in the OP. Russia had a vested interest in skewing and interfering with US politics in 2016.
There’s the relevancy you failed to see.
ebc@lemmy.ca 4 months ago
Even if Assange himself was openly interfering in US politics, how is that relevant? If he isn’t a US person, and he’s not on US soil, why would he be bound by US law? US law isn’t universal law, you know.
sunzu@kbin.run 4 months ago
People don't like the guy, that's enough jurisdiction for them!
ebc@lemmy.ca 4 months ago
From this thread, looks like you’re right, sadly…