Sounds like journalists can just make shit up and publish it. “Telsa declined to comment.” so I guess it’s true until corrected.
ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Neato@ttrpg.network 4 months ago
frezik@midwest.social 4 months ago
It’s how journalists apply pressure to companies to respond. “We have statements x, y, and z from the public about you. Do you care to respond? We need to go to press with it in two hours.” Companies can ignore it if they want, but the statements will go uncontested.
DaddleDew@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Let me fill in for them then: “We CoUlDn’T PoSsIbLy pReDiCt ThAt tHiS wAs GoInG tO hApPeN!”
That’s the usual typical Corporate bad faith answer to whenever a serious consequence that everyone could see coming but they kept ignoring finally happens.
helenslunch@feddit.nl 4 months ago
Honestly it’s pretty smart. There’s nothing you can say in the modern age that won’t be intentionally misrepresented, misquoted, or otherwise twisted. Plus there’s really no defending stupid decisions like this. Same reason Apple almost never comments on anything that isn’t marketing. They know they can’t justify their bullshit.
cheese_greater@lemmy.world 4 months ago
MadLad that Elmo is
iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 4 months ago
Does it also send a poop emoji now?