Comment on OP: "This is my most advance moon photograph EVER it consist of 81000 images and over 708GB of data." (see comments.)

FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

• friend_of_satan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Is that just the Samsung smart camera composite?

  source

  • Liz@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    The Samsung moon actually just makes up a plausible looking moon, which is hilarious given that the moon essentially doesn’t change, so they could have just overlayed reference images. Instead, you get features on the moon that don’t exist.

    source
  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Huh? Nah it’s an old Canon 1300D. I had to hold the tripod still with sandbags while it took.

    source

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      My comment was mostly sarcasm. theverge.com/…/samsung-fake-moon-photos-ai-galaxy…

      Cool that you used a “real” camera to do it. Just the experience of doing that is satisfying even if the photos don’t come out great.

      source

      • And009@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        Then we appreciate the Nasa images more

        source
• Kichae@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  They didn’t. What they did was take 81,000 images and then filter through, them taking the best images of each region of the Moon and then averaging and compositing those.

  It isn’t 81k images stitched together. It’s 81k images taken in the hopes of getting enough with perfect clarity to create the composite.

  source
• fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Good question.

  source