Comment

srecko@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

You can interpret it that way now but that’s not the original meanig.

I understand and respect where you are coming from but i prefer not to rewrite history while arguing about ideas.

Sort:hotnew top

AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Yes, thank you, you’re exactly right. The person you’re responding to is correct that it’s come to have science vs religion overtones, but that’s not what the expression meant to people for ages and ages.

source
- MrShankles@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  
  a metaphoric adjective describing situations where it is not clear which of two events should be considered the cause and which should be considered the effect
  
  I guess the overtones are a product of their times. Currently, it seems to be: is science/religion the “cause” or “effect”.
  
  I always staked claim that it was a “scientific vs philosophical” question; but I never considered how timeline could change the overtones or underlying thinking of “The chicken and the egg” concept. Neat
  
  source
LillyPip@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
You’re right, I shouldn’t have said ‘never’. It was a paradox in ancient history, but at least in my lifetime, I’ve read it as basically solved. That may be a relatively recent stance (since 100-200 years ago), but it doesn’t seem useful to continue presenting it as a paradox at this point.

source