Comment on Why Super for Housing is a Bad Idea - Purplepingers
ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 months agoHaving multiple is fine, just remove negative gearing and investment incentives along with actually enforced building standards
Comment on Why Super for Housing is a Bad Idea - Purplepingers
ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 months agoHaving multiple is fine, just remove negative gearing and investment incentives along with actually enforced building standards
Nath@aussie.zone 5 months ago
People will just go back to what they did before negative gearing: Make businesses and move their properties into that. “Oh, your business made a loss paying more interest than it brought in as rent, I guess you can write that off as a loss and not pay tax on your income”.
The result is the same, but it’s more work for the ATO.
My old boss still had his holiday home under the business, because it’s how he did it before Negative Gearing was a thing.
ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 5 months ago
Make it so that interest on money borrowed against residential real estate can’t be declared as a business loss then. That’ll also make speculating housing investment funds a bad idea
Taleya@aussie.zone 5 months ago
If that were the case we wouldn’t have aeen a sharp uptick in investment at the same time NG was introduced.
You’re always gonna have people finding ways around things, the point is to make it hard enough your average schmoe bails on the attempt
ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 months ago
Same thing would probably happen with property limits then