Comment on Cyberpunk 2077 director thanks fans as the game hits a 95% positive review rating on Steam
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 5 months agoSounds more like downplaying the severity of one.
Comment on Cyberpunk 2077 director thanks fans as the game hits a 95% positive review rating on Steam
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 5 months agoSounds more like downplaying the severity of one.
ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I’m not downplaying anything, but comparing a dumpster to a dumpster fire and saying they are the same thing is, at best, a little misleading.
The release of Witcher 3 was bad, but it was industry standard bad. Cyberpunk shipped straight up broken and incomplete. It has been fundamentally reworked at least twice since launch.
I don’t think anyone is apologizing for The Witcher 3 at launch, but let’s not pretend they are the same thing. There are more shades than black and white.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 5 months ago
It’s more like both are tornados and one is an F3 and the other being an F5.
An industry standard bad? What’s that even mean? At that point in time games were shipping complete still and not in a beta state.
Its always hilarious the excuses people come up with, neither are excusable, yet here you are justifying one… yeesh, give your head a shake.
ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Haha ok so you’re just one of those people whose understanding of the universe isn’t capable of expanding beyond “this good, that bad”.
I haven’t defended anyone and never intended to. I’m just saying get your comparisons straight. “Hey this game has a bunch of annoying bugs” =/= “Yo this shit is effectively non-functional and empty”.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I didn’t know a a progress breaking bug at 80 hours in is annoying…? That falls in the latter, non-functional.
Sounds like you just aren’t educated on what the issues actually were, rose coloured glasses or something…. So not only disingenuous now.