Yeah, just like more experienced artists can see the AI generated pixels.
Comment on Codeberg bans vibe coded projects
povoq@slrpnk.net@slrpnk.net 1 day ago You might not be able to tell, but the signs something is LLM generated are pretty obvious to more experienced programmers.
Epp@lemmus.org 1 day ago
- povoq@slrpnk.net@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
Are you trying to make some point? Because, yes they can.
iamthetot@piefed.ca 1 day ago
I hate genAI, but this is dangerous. I’m a writer and I’ve had my stuff accused of being genAI when it’s not. And there was an incident several years ago on a prominent art subreddit where an artist was banned for posting AI art, and when the artist proved it wasn’t by sending layer files, the mod upheld the ban and told the artist they should change styles because it “looked” like genAI. It’s not a great feeling.
Epp@lemmus.org 1 day ago
Yes, I am. I have a global pre-processor directive for all of my prompts, so it always includes “match existing code style, formatting and conventions.” The result is indistinguishable from hand written code. Thinking you can magically discern what was written by AI is delusional.
- povoq@slrpnk.net@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
Sorry but you are clearly delusional. There is no magic involved, just being able to look at the structure of the code and the pattern of the commits. It’s fairly easy in fact.
tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 1 day ago
That, plus, it’s driving away vibe coders just because they don’t want to be there. The rule doesn’t have to be enforceable 100% in order to be effective.