Comment on Codeberg bans vibe coded projects
Epp@lemmus.org 3 weeks ago
This is just to let fly their prejudice flag. There’s no way to actually tell AI was used if the planning and assisting meta-data files aren’t committed to the repo. Nothing has truly changed. They might as well banned anyone who thinks about the color pink more then twice per day - it would be just as easy to enforce.
You might not be able to tell, but the signs something is LLM generated are pretty obvious to more experienced programmers.
tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 3 weeks ago
That, plus, it’s driving away vibe coders just because they don’t want to be there. The rule doesn’t have to be enforceable 100% in order to be effective.
Epp@lemmus.org 3 weeks ago
Yeah, just like more experienced artists can see the AI generated pixels.
Are you trying to make some point? Because, yes they can.
iamthetot@piefed.ca 3 weeks ago
I hate genAI, but this is dangerous. I’m a writer and I’ve had my stuff accused of being genAI when it’s not. And there was an incident several years ago on a prominent art subreddit where an artist was banned for posting AI art, and when the artist proved it wasn’t by sending layer files, the mod upheld the ban and told the artist they should change styles because it “looked” like genAI. It’s not a great feeling.
Epp@lemmus.org 3 weeks ago
Yes, I am. I have a global pre-processor directive for all of my prompts, so it always includes “match existing code style, formatting and conventions.” The result is indistinguishable from hand written code. Thinking you can magically discern what was written by AI is delusional.