I’m going to go ahead and try to use this comment as a teachable moment.
For one, this comment barely skirts the line to me as acceptable. If you aren’t interested in AI topics, thats what the [AIT] and [AIP] tags are for - for you, as a user, to choose what you are interested in and what you are not.
The first part of your comment, by itself, I would have simply removed. You asked for alternatives, and are being rightfully replied to pointing out that this is all under the subject of automation, which (to me) barely puts this above low effort.
If you don’t want to see AI discussions in the future, use the tags to filter. If I see more comments like this that are barely, and entirely subjectively just above low-effort, the bar is going to raise just a hair and they will be removed, as they will come across like trying to skirt the rules.
Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
You’re asking for suggestions for an automatic document categorization tool that doesn’t use any automatic document categorization?
TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 1 day ago
How about one that doesn’t use LLMs to code?
boonhet@sopuli.xyz 19 hours ago
Just fork it from before 2025 when Claude Code was released?
lambisio@feddit.cl 1 day ago
You don’t need a knife to make a knife, and things like OCR are different from AI (or from “AI”).
Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 23 hours ago
Paperless and Papermerge have always done a lot more than just OCR. If that’s all they were, most people can do that already on the software that comes with their scanner. The core selling point of these applications is automatic categorization, sorting and tagging, and those have always relied on machine learning tools. Literally the first thing you do after setting Paperless up is start training the AI.
tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 20 hours ago
Yes, though that used to be discriminative AI, where now generative AI is used if I’m not mistaken.