Comment on [deleted]

• venusaur@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Sure but they’re not leaving… They have the largest user base by over 100M. Is that why u added the “lmao”? Sarcasm?

  source

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I left over the past year 🤷‍♂️ I imagine more and more will do so as the service continues to slide further to shit

    source

    • DieguiTux8623@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Me too, and Lemmy inspired me to unsub! 😉

      source
    • venusaur@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      What is shit about it though? Just pay for it. It’s worth it.

      source

      • bluespin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I’ve paid for Spotify for years and it is, without a doubt, getting shittier. They removed the integrated google maps car mode without a real replacement. They push podcasts, which most users do not care about, heavily now, despite having poor support for them UX-wise. They keep moving UI elements around without purpose. I’ve read they also have an exploitative revenue model for musicians on the service, but haven’t confirmed that bit myself.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Apple has many more subscribers than in the USA, I know Europe uses Spotify more.

    But the funny thing is that even with a larger user base, Spotify has NEVER posted a profit (which gets significantly more negative each year). They also have been loosing a substantial percentage of their revenue per user each year as they further enshittify their platform.

    They should be VERY concerned about losing users, and taking away features will end up doing just that.

    source

    • venusaur@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      So confused. A bunch of people using a platform for free criticizing them for never making a profit, then complaining when they try to make a profit that doesn’t interfere with listening to music?

      Do y’all feel the same way about YouTube? They were bought by Google and had to start drowning free users in ads to make profits.

      source

      • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Yes I feel the same way about YouTube, and I’m confident many others do as well.

        You can pretend that users who trade their time listening to and viewing ads don’t deserve the to be upset with enshittification, but I wholeheartedly disagree. That line of thinking tracks very well with Musk’s approach to X, another service that was the “biggest” but not profitable. Look how they have done moving features behind paywalls and upending the expectations of their user base.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • small44@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Do you really believe this will make them more money?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • NekkoDroid@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      But the funny thing is that even with a larger user base, Spotify has NEVER posted a profit

      I honestly doubt if you’d isolate Apple Music it’d be any different for them.

      source
  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    TikTok has a huge user base and they’re leaving.

    Spotify has a huge user base but most people pay nothing. They’ll be leaving if they never learn how to extract more money from users. Thus, these kind of desperate moves like hiding lyrics.

    • statista.com/…/profitability-development-of-spoti…
    • techcrunch.com/…/spotify-now-has-more-than-500m-u…

    source

    • venusaur@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      The TikTok thing is likely influenced by the possible ban in US.

      As their users keep growing they can charge more in ads, but to your point, they will have to find a way to get more people to pay for the service. Maybe they need tiered pricing. One price for no ads and another price for additional features like lyrics.

      source