Right… someone dared to be overtly anti-genocide - oh the horror!
Comment on [deleted]
PoPoP@lemm.ee 6 months agoan important technology we rely on is displaying a strong bias
masquenox@lemmy.world 6 months ago
1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 6 months ago
Wikipedia’s job isn’t free to be anti- or pro- anything, it’s to show facts free from bias, even if you and most other readers agree with that bias.
Of course the facts can clearly show something to be almost objectively evil to anyone capable of understanding them, but it’s not for Wikipedia to perform any analysis of those facts - saying “Israel has killed X civilians in attacks which many of their allies claimed were completely avoidable [citation]” in an article featured on the front page is perfectly valid, however a big banner with a Palestinian flag is not as it’s a (fair) interpretation of the facts and not simply a presentation of them.
ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 6 months ago
A strong bias against genocide and in favour of peace is not a very disagreeable one.
Woozythebear@lemmy.world 6 months ago
It’s is if you’re a liberal
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Stupid liberals and their hatred of genocide…