Comment on [deleted]

southsamurai@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• PoPoP@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  an important technology we rely on is displaying a strong bias

  source

  • ChairmanMeow@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    A strong bias against genocide and in favour of peace is not a very disagreeable one.

    source

    • Woozythebear@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It’s is if you’re a liberal

      source

      • FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Stupid liberals and their hatred of genocide…

        source
  • masquenox@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Right… someone dared to be overtly anti-genocide - oh the horror!

    source

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Wikipedia’s job isn’t free to be anti- or pro- anything, it’s to show facts free from bias, even if you and most other readers agree with that bias.

      Of course the facts can clearly show something to be almost objectively evil to anyone capable of understanding them, but it’s not for Wikipedia to perform any analysis of those facts - saying “Israel has killed X civilians in attacks which many of their allies claimed were completely avoidable [citation]” in an article featured on the front page is perfectly valid, however a big banner with a Palestinian flag is not as it’s a (fair) interpretation of the facts and not simply a presentation of them.

      source
• rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I’m about to start posting ctrl+alt+del edits if this keeps up.

  source