“propagandists”? “narrative”!?
Lol they answered your question with the very first sentence! The rest is just expanding on the point…
Comment on Tesla to lay off everyone working on Superchargers, new vehicles
Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 6 months agoIm making a valid point while you’re trying to tell me what I should be saying instead
“propagandists”? “narrative”!?
Lol they answered your question with the very first sentence! The rest is just expanding on the point…
You are not making a valid argument, as evidenced by your argument being torn to shreds in the comments her.
Your point was invalid with a heaping side of Ludicrous.
Let me be crystal fucking clear here.
You were not making a valid point.
Your hypothetical is so amazingly absurd that I did not fully believe you were being serious until I saw your response.
I’m still wondering if this isn’t some sort of weird ass false flag attempt to make people who dislike Musk look like absolute raving loonies.
I tried to give you places to begin looking into things yourself so you (and anyone else as delusional as you) wouldn’t be worried about something so unlikely as to be effectively impossible.
I’m not doing that work for you, I’ve already had to sit through countless discussions of this shit in my lifetime. Multiple nuclear engineers in the (extended) family, have met members of the regulatory orgs through them, and that’s what my parents wanted me to grow up to be (I fucked off into computers though).
Beyond that, I tried to give you some stuff against Musk that’s far more rooted in reality than the wildest speculation.
But I really couldn’t give a shit what you talk about. I just dislike seeing people underminig legitimate points by throwing around absurd exageration. Especially when there’s plenty of legitimate criticisms and comcerns out there about Musk.
Please, do go on about how he’s going to somehow outsmart intelligence agencies that took out an entire country’s nuclear program with a single goddamn computer virus. At this point it’s just entertaining.
Cryophilia@lemmy.world 6 months ago
That’s not how validity works
Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Oh it’s valid whether you want to believe it or not.
Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I think “Valid” just isn’t the word you’re looking for here. Valid requires verification, and since your point was verifyably false, valid isn’t what you were going for. Scary hypothesis, nightmare fuel, anything where it doesn’t have to actually be possible to still cause a fear response would be terms that fit better.
Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 6 months ago
It is becoming easier to spot A.I. posters. They’ll have a coherent argument yet will constantly misspell words a person of their supposed intelligence should know. It’ll look and sound about right, but not 100%. I’ve read traffic is about 50% bots, starting to add up
Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 6 months ago